PrecisionKit

Pallet Calculator

Estimate how many boxes fit per pallet layer and in total, within your height and weight limits — a planning estimate, not a stability certification.

Pallet
Box

72total boxes

9 per layer (non-rotated) × 8 full layers.

Diagram is proportional, not to exact scale. Outer rectangle = pallet footprint; each cell = one box in the non-rotated arrangement.
Layer candidates
ArrangementGridPer layerArea used
non-rotated3 × 3990.0%
rotated4 × 2880.0%
Pallet totals
MetricValue
Usable height165 cm
Layers8
Geometry capacity72
Weight capacityNo weight limit set
Total boxes72
Result: 72 total boxes

Layer arrangement candidates

How this is calculated
boxesPerLayer = floor(palletLength / boxLength) × floor(palletWidth / boxWidth)

This tool evaluates the same grid formula for boxes non-rotated and, if allowed, rotated 90°, then reports whichever fits more per layer — the best of two documented candidates, not a proven global optimum.

Worked example

120 × 100 cm pallet, 40 × 30 cm boxes: non-rotated gives 3 × 3 = 9 per layer; rotated gives 4 × 2 = 8 per layer — 9 wins. With 2 layers, geometry capacity is at least 18, but a 100 kg net payload at 10 kg/carton caps it at 10 cartons, including a partial top layer.

Usable height and pallet tare

Whether your height limit includes the pallet itself changes usable stacking height directly — this tool asks explicitly rather than guessing. Pallet tare (its own weight) is only subtracted from the weight limit in gross-limit mode; net-payload mode already excludes it.

Load limits and partial layers

Total capacity is the lower of geometry capacity (height-limited layers × boxes per layer) and weight capacity, when a weight limit is set. A partial top layer is permitted and shown separately in the results and diagram.

Algorithm limits

This tool reports the best of two simple grid candidates, not a globally optimal mixed-orientation packing. It is also not a structural, compression, stability or transport-safety certification — always follow your own load-securing and stacking guidance.

Best found, not optimal
Reports the better of non-rotated and rotated grid candidates.
Not a safety certification
Fit does not certify stability, compression or transport safety.

Questions

Is the reported arrangement globally optimal?

No. This tool evaluates two deterministic grid candidates — boxes non-rotated and boxes rotated 90° — and reports whichever fits more per layer. A true mixed-orientation packing algorithm could sometimes fit more boxes than either simple grid, but that kind of bin-packing optimization is out of scope here. Treat the result as a solid planning estimate, not a proven maximum.

Does the height limit include the pallet?

Only if you say so. This tool asks explicitly whether your entered height limit already includes the pallet's own height — if it does, usable stacking height is the limit minus pallet height; if the limit is for the load only, the full limit is usable. Getting this toggle wrong is one of the most common pallet-planning mistakes.